{"id":7826,"date":"2024-07-13T06:33:38","date_gmt":"2024-07-13T06:33:38","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/maklegal.in\/demo\/domestic-violence-cases-in-india\/"},"modified":"2024-07-13T06:33:38","modified_gmt":"2024-07-13T06:33:38","slug":"domestic-violence-cases-in-india","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/maklegal.in\/demo\/domestic-violence-cases-in-india\/","title":{"rendered":"Domestic Violence cases in India."},"content":{"rendered":"<p><strong>\u00a0Domestic Violence Cases Lawyer in Delhi. <\/strong><\/p>\n<p>&#8211; Lalita Toppo v. the State of Jharkhand (2018): The Supreme Court ruled that a live-in partner can seek maintenance under the Domestic Violence Act, 2005. &#8211; Inder Raj Malik v. Sunita Malik (1986): The Delhi High Court ruled that a person can be convicted under both the Dowry Prohibition Act and Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code. &#8211; Hiralal P. Harsora and Ors v. Kusum Narottamdas Harsora and Ors (2016): The Supreme Court ruled that females can also be liable under the Domestic Violence Act, 2005. &#8211; Sandhya Wankhede v. Manoj Bhimrao Wankhede (2011): The Supreme Court ruled that complaints can be filed not only against the adult male person but also against the adult male\u2019s female relatives. &#8211; V.D. Bhanot v. Savita Bhanot (2012): The Supreme Court ruled that the Domestic Violence Act, 2005, also includes victims of domestic violence prior to 2005. &#8211; Rajesh Kumar and others v. the State of U.P (2017): The Supreme Court directed the formation of a \u201cFamily Welfare Committee\u201d to deal with Section 498A of the IPC.<\/p>\n<p>#lawyerindelhi<\/p>\n<p>#lawfirmindelhi<\/p>\n<p>#advocateindelhi<\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignnone size-medium wp-image-1768\" src=\"https:\/\/maklegal.in\/demo\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/12\/sfd-1024x576-1-300x169-1.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"300\" height=\"169\" \/><\/p>\n<p>#familymatterscaseslawyerindelhi.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>\u00a0Domestic Violence Cases Lawyer in Delhi. &#8211; Lalita Toppo v. the State of Jharkhand (2018): The Supreme Court ruled that a live-in partner can seek maintenance under the Domestic Violence Act, 2005. &#8211; Inder Raj Malik v. Sunita Malik (1986): The Delhi High Court ruled that a person can be convicted under both the Dowry [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":7827,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[16],"tags":[67,73,82,83,84],"class_list":["post-7826","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-blog","tag-advocateindelhi","tag-familymatterscaseslawyerindelhi","tag-lawfirmindelhi","tag-lawyersindelhi","tag-childcustodylawyerindelhi"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/maklegal.in\/demo\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7826","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/maklegal.in\/demo\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/maklegal.in\/demo\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/maklegal.in\/demo\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/maklegal.in\/demo\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=7826"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/maklegal.in\/demo\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7826\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/maklegal.in\/demo\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/7827"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/maklegal.in\/demo\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=7826"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/maklegal.in\/demo\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=7826"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/maklegal.in\/demo\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=7826"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}